A ceasefire and a deal has been reached after nearly four months of conflict between the United States and Iran.
However, after the announcement of the agreement, new debates have been created about US President Donald Trump’s strategy and combat management. Analysts and critics say most of Trump’s goals and conditions announced at the start of the war have not been implemented.
During the war, Trump spoke of Iran’s “unconditional surrender”, a complete end to its nuclear capabilities and strict control. But at the end of the war, Iran’s political structure remains in place and new negotiations on the nuclear issue have been opened. As a result, many observers believe that the final result has come to the fore as a compromise solution rather than the expected victory of the United States.
One of the most important aspects of the agreement is the naturalization of international shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. This could restore stability in the global energy market and the possibility of a drop in oil prices. However, according to analysts, this is basically equivalent to going back to pre-war state.
On the other hand, despite Iran’s military and economic losses due to the war, the country has had the opportunity to strategically reorganize its position. Iran has shown that it is capable of sustaining a strong opposition like the United States and Israel.